Connect with us

Business

Giant ship blocking Suez Canal freed, but economic impact looms

Published

on


The week-long closure of the Suez Canal will continue to weigh on the economy despite the massive container ship that has been stuck there finally being freed on Monday, experts said.

Ever Given, the giant ship that has blocked the highly-trafficked waterway since March 23, was pulled free on Monday, marking a major step toward getting one of the world’s most important trade arteries moving again.

The blockage had cost nearly $10 billion a day in global trade, placing stress on supply chains already stretched thin during the coronavirus pandemic. Based on rough calculations by maritime intelligence company Lloyd’s List, the closure blocked about $400 million in goods every hour. In total, it impacted about $5.1 billion a day in westbound traffic to Europe and $4.5 billion in daily eastbound traffic.

While long-term impact of the weeklong closure will likely be small given that global merchandise trade amounts to $18 trillion a year, the blockage has caused a bottleneck by throwing ships off schedule. Some 450 ships carrying cargo are now expected to be delayed in reaching their final destinations for weeks, if not months.

Companies from Ikea to Caterpillar have been affected, as well as tens of thousands of live animals, mostly sheep, have been stuck on ships in the area. Consumer goods like coffee, oil, toilet paper and even a massive shipment of sex toys have also been caught up in the jam.

The dozen or so container carriers that control most of the world’s ocean freight are already charging record-high fees on some routes amid shortages of everything from chemicals and lumber to dockside labor, Bloomberg reported.

View of the Ever Given.
Ever Given, the giant ship that has blocked the highly-trafficked waterway since March 23, was pulled free on Monday.
Mohamed Abd El Ghany/Reuters

“The dominoes have been toppled,” Lars Jensen, chief executive of SeaIntelligence Consulting in Copenhagen, wrote on social media. “The delays and re-routing which have already happened will cause ripple effects” will be felt for several months.

Over the course of the week, Egyptian authorities have been desperate to get traffic flowing again through the canal, which is a channel for about 12 percent of world trade and about 1 million barrels of oil a day. This has been the canal’s longest closure since it was shut for eight years following the 1967 Six Day War.

Douglas Kent, executive vice president of strategy and alliances at the Association for Supply Chain Management said that even though the ship is dislodged, the economic impact of the blockage will be hard to quantify.

Ever Given container ship after it has been moved.
This has been the Suez Canal’s longest closure since it was shut for eight years following the 1967 Six Day War.
EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

“The whole knock-on effect through the multi-hierarchy of the supply base — we’re not going to know that,” Kent told CNBC. “Companies don’t have visibility into their supply chain.” While a company might know it has a product sitting on a ship that’s stopped, the impact of delays down the line are unknown.

Fitch chief economist Brian Coultron told The Post that while the Suez Canal debacle won’t likely have a material impact on gross domestic product, but it may put pressure on global inflation.

He said the rising price of oil and other commodities is already impacting pricing, and that the Suez Canal incident is “exacerbating all that.”

“We’re going to see headline inflation rates pick up quite sharply in the US,” Coultron said, noting that the the uptick will be determined by when navigation can return to normal in the canal.

“If things return to normal by the end of the week, I don’t expect a major impact,” he concluded.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Tesla more than doubles Q1 sales, delivers 185,000 vehicles

Published

on

By


Tesla says it delivered nearly 185,000 electric vehicles in the first quarter despite a shortage of computer chips that has hit the global auto industry.

The number was more than double the deliveries for the same period last year. And it beat Wall Street estimates of 168,000 for January through March. The company says in a statement that the Model Y small SUV in China has been well received.

Tesla lists no production figures for its older models, the S sedan and X SUV, during the quarter, but it delivered just over 2,000 of them. It says new equipment has been installed at the Fremont, California, factory and production of new versions is in the early stages.

The strong sales are a sign that demand for the company’s relatively expensive vehicles remains strong despite the pandemic. Analysts polled by data provider FactSet estimate that the average selling price of a Tesla is $49,100.

Shares of Tesla are down more than 9 percent so far this year as some of the shine wore off electric vehicle and tech stocks, which had experienced a big runup last year. The stock closed Thursday down just under 1 percent at $661.75. Markets are closed for the Good Friday holiday.

Tesla Model 3s (seen here) and its Model Y accounted for nearly all of Tesla's first-quarter sales.
Tesla Model 3s (seen here) and its Model Y accounted for nearly all of Tesla’s first-quarter sales.
Xinhua News Agency via Getty Images

Tesla sold just under 500,000 vehicles last year, barely missing a target set by CEO Elon Musk. The company hasn’t given much guidance for this year’s sales figures.

Wedbush analyst Dan Ives called the first-quarter numbers a “jaw dropper,” and a huge home run in the eyes of bullish investors. “We believe China and Europe were particularly robust this quarter as the trajectory now puts Musk & Co. to exceed 850k for the year which is well ahead of whisper expectations,” he wrote Friday.

The Model 3 small car and the Model Y accounted for nearly all of the Palo Alto, California, company’s first-quarter sales. Tesla said it sold 182,780 of both models combined.

Ives wrote that analysts expected more than 12,000 sales of Models S and X, with the miss driven by the chip shortage.

The strong sales came even though the company shut down much of its Fremont production for several weeks in late February and early March. It did not say why, but it’s likely that the company ran short of computer chips.

President Joe Biden’s announcement this week of $174 billion in spending on electric vehicle incentives and charging stations, and rising global demand for electric vehicles should shift sentiment toward Tesla stock, Ives wrote.

“It’s been a brutal sell-off for Tesla and EVs, but we believe that will now be in the rearview mirror,” he wrote.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

55 firms paid no federal income tax last year, report finds

Published

on

By


Dozens of America’s biggest companies paid no federal income taxes last year thanks to a range of tax breaks — including some brand-new ones, a new report says.

The 55 corporations avoided a total of $8.5 billion in taxes on more than $40 billion in pre-tax profits in their most recent fiscal year, according to the Friday report from the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

In fact, 52 of those firms — including household names such as Nike, FedEx and Dish Network — ended up pocketing federal tax rebates worth a collective $3.5 billion, the left-leaning think tank’s analysis found.

And 26 of them haven’t paid a penny in federal income tax in the three years since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act reform bill was signed into law in 2017, the report says. That group includes shipping giant FedEx and power company Duke Energy, which reported nearly $15 billion in pre-tax income for those three years, according to the findings.

Nike sneakers
Nike is among dozens of major corporations reported to be paying little to no federal income taxes.
Getty Images

“Duke Energy fully complies with federal and state tax laws as part of our efforts to make investments that will benefit our customers and communities,” company spokesperson Catherine Butler said, adding that Duke paid more than $2 billion in annual state and local taxes in 2020.

Major companies have used loopholes in federal tax law to help their bottom line for decades, the think tank’s researchers note. But they got a fresh boon from the CARES Act, the $2.2 trillion stimulus bill that aimed to help businesses weather the COVID-19 pandemic.

Big firms were able to take advantage of a provision in the bill to use losses they racked up in 2018 or 2019 to offset profits from previous years, which slashed some of their 2020 tax bills to less than zero, according to the report. That measure accounted for at least $500 million of the 55 giants’ tax breaks, the report says.

FedEx stood by the CARES Act tax breaks, saying the law helped it and other companies “navigate a rapidly changing economy and marketplace while continuing to invest in capital, hire team members, and fund employee pension plans.”

FedEx truck
FedEx is said to be among major firms pocketing federal tax rebates while avoiding federal income taxes.
Alamy Stock Photo

But many companies also used more established methods for giving themselves tax discounts.

Those include write-offs for paying executives in stock, which were used by more than a dozen companies, while at least half a dozen took federal research and experimentation credits, the report says.

The list included some companies hit hard by the pandemic, including crafts retailer Michaels, as well as companies that thrived despite the lockdowns, like Salesforce.com, the cloud computing company that announced record 2020 earnings in February.

Salesforce logo
Salesforce is reported to be among thriving firms able to take advantage of numerous write-offs.
Getty Images

By reining in tax breaks like those, “or by re-introducing some form of a ‘minimum tax’ requiring profitable companies to pay at least some tax in any profitable year, Congress and President Biden could take a major step toward a fairer and more sustainable tax system,” authors Matthew Gardner and Steve Wamhoff wrote in the report.

Salesforce, Michaels, Nike and Dish Network did not immediately respond to requests for comment.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

China admonishes H&M over ‘problematic’ map on website

Published

on

By


Swedish retailer H&M continues to clash with Beijing, this time over how it has portrayed the region geographically.

Chinese officials admonished H&M Friday over a “problematic” map on the company’s website in the latest sign of escalating tensions after the Swedish retailer criticized China’s controversial cotton-picking region.

Shanghai government regulators summoned H&M managers to a meeting after internet users complained about the map, officials said on social media.

Chinese officials did not provide any detail about the alleged offense, which they said H&M managers quickly corrected.

But H&M got in trouble with China in 2018 for listing Taiwan as a country on the Taiwanese version of its website. China claims the democratic island country is part of its territory.

H&M was told to “bolster its awareness of the national territory, and really ensure the standardized use of the Chinese map,” the Cyberspace Administration of China’s Shanghai arm said in a post on the WeChat social network, according to The Wall Street Journal.

H&M did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday.

The map flap is just the latest headache H&M has faced in China, the fast-fashion retailer’s top clothing supplier and its fourth-largest market by sales.

The company was hit with boycott threats last week and had its products pulled from Chinese e-commerce platforms over a statement it made last year saying it does not source cotton from the Xinjiang region, where Beijing has been accused of forced labor practices against Uyghur Muslims.

H&M tried to tamp down the backlash Wednesday with a new statement saying it’s “dedicated to regaining the trust and confidence” of its customers, colleagues and business partners in China, where its store locations were reportedly scrubbed from digital maps last week.

The company said it wants to be “a responsible buyer, in China and elsewhere,” but did not mention Xinjiang specifically.

With Post wires

Source link



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending